VDARE-cleburne-mcconnel-schumer

Tuberville’s Tormentors: Sens. McConnell (R-PRC) and Schumer (D-Israel) Veto American Whites Protecting Their Interests

By Patrick Cleburne

07/15/2023

As James Fulford noted in Tommy Tuberville Vs. Chuck Schumer on “White Nationalism” — Or Americanism, we were all very surprised to see this objectively weak Con Inc. replacement for Alabama’s great Senator Sessions taking an interest in white Americans:

…the reporter asked Tuberville, “Do you believe they should allow white nationalists in the military?” Tuberville said, “Well, they call them that. I call them Americans.”

Inevitably Tuberville was immediately bullied into cucking: Tommy Tuberville now says ‘White nationalists are racists’ after refusing to denounce them, by Manu Raju, Rashard Rose and Lauren Fox, CNN, July 11, 2023.

Leaders of the Political Police were Chuck Schumer (D-Israel) and Mitch McConnell (R-PRC).

Part of the problem here is a malicious confusion of terms. White Supremacy in the sense of whites keeping political control over other races, which was a conscious strategy in the post-Reconstruction South for obvious reasons, was broken by federal power in the Civil Rights Era, with largely unreported results (see here, here). I think that simple White Supremacism, in the sense of the belief that whites are superior, which was at least plausible in the 19th century, is now extinct. Apart from the huge Asian economic renaissance, everyone who looks into the matter is aware of the racial IQ distribution and its implications. This science was not available until the 20th century.

What remains viable is white particularism, or ethnocentrism: the notion that whites can and should take action to protect the interests of their own group. (This is the definition long favored by VDARE.com.) For whites, this is crucial at a time when other groups are already practicing it in an ethnically diverse society.

This legitimacy of white interests is what I am trying to get over to the GOP Smithsonian Regents: Black Conquers Asian at Smithsonian. ASK GOP Regents Why Not a WHITE Women’s Museum Director?

As Senator Tuberville has apparently sensed, white interests desperately need protecting in the military. This week the Senate is moving to confirm what John Derbyshire describes as a White-Hating Black General to Head Our Anti-White Military. I tweeted:

Greenfield’s superb analysis of new Joint Chiefs Head Brown’s record reveals besides 43% White officer quota "readiness rates for the F-35A rate fell from 76% to 68% from 2020 In 2022, rates fell to an outrageous 54%” [link].
Brown Air Force chief in 2020https://t.co/YnxCof2Arv

— Patrick Cleburne (@PCleburneVdare) May 17, 2023

Greenfield’s underlying article, Next Joint Chiefs Chairman Wants White Male Officers to Be a Minority [frontpagemag.com, May 11, 2023], notes:

…quotas had been issued by political appointees in a Politically Correct military, but they had focused on slowly boosting minority officers rather than calling for a purge of white men.

The 2014 quotas had looked for an 80 percent white, 10 percent black and 8 percent Asian officer corps … this fell short of Brown’s proposed racist purge.

Brown’s quotas limit the number of white officers to 67% and cut white men down to 43% … getting it down to 67%, a reduction of 10%, would require serious effort to purge white officers and bar the doors to any new ones.

As Paul Craig Roberts commented:

The real reason for recruitment failure is the recruitment message to the white heterosexual males, essentially from the “racist” South who have always been the backbone of the military services:

Join the military and be discriminated againstYou will not be promoted. The US military has too many white officers. Your officers will be blacks, feminists, homosexuals, and transgendered freaks who have been taught to hate heterosexual white males… In fact, you and your despicable kind in the civilian population are the main enemy as seen by US Armed Forces.

[Why the US Armed Services Cannot Recruit, July 11, 2023]

Judging by his mumbles in the CNN article cited above, Mitch McConnell has no idea of what White Nationalism vs. White Supremacism means. He just knows he wants to do what his donors demand. That does not include protecting white Americans.

My comment:

Q: What Military would benefit the most from a collapse in U.S. military technical competence as unsuitable browns and women waste training capabilities?

A: Obviously, China.

This is why the issue I raised in Gatestone Says “Hundreds” of U.S. Politicians Purchased. How Can Mitch McConnell NOT Be One? is so desperately important.

Chuck Schumer is a different matter entirely.

There are many gradations of Nationalism. At the mildest, it is not much more than an affection for language, literature, dress and cuisine. Most do not aspire to actually eliminating other nations.

As a major beneficiary of “Coalition of the Fringes“ politics, Schumer has always been determined to blur the differences between White Nationalism and White Supremacism. As he was quoted lying in the CNN article above:

“The definition of white nationalism is not a matter of opinion. White nationalism, the ideology that one race is inherently superior to others, that people of color should be segregated, subjected to second-class citizenship, is racist down to its rotten core.” [My emphasis]

Schumer lives in dread that the GOP might reformulate along the lines of the Generic American Party (GAP) and wreck his plans for this country.

To save our Palestinian readers writing in: It has to be said that Schumer’s definition of White Nationalism sounds a lot like Zionism as practiced in Israel.

Here’s what Schumer recently said about his Zionism:

[as] the highest-ranking Jewish American elected official in history, I stand here today in the shadow of my ancestors who perished in the Holocaust to promise that as long as Hashem breathes air into my lungs, the United States Senate will stand behind Israel with our fullest support.
[Chuck Schumer declares “fullest support” for Israel, by Michael F. Brown, The Electronic Intifada, February 27, 2023]

This scathing article continues:

As for Schumer, his views on Israel have not changed. His religious language and support for Israel is not far removed from the remarks he made at an AIPAC conference in 2018 when he intoned in bigoted and exclusivist terms against Palestinians: “We say it’s our land. The Torah says it. But they [Palestinians] don’t believe in the Torah. So, that’s the reason there is not peace.”

Shades of Sheldon Adelson!

To get the true measure of this dishonest and extremely dangerous man, I strongly recommend Did Schumer Shill for Madoff?, by John Graham, Occidental Observer, January 16, 2011.

In brief, Schumer had fundraisers in Ponzi scheme operator Bernard Madoff’s offices, and intervened to chill the last and most serious SEC investigation into Madoff 2006-8. Then he commandeered the afternoon session of the Senate banking committee investigating the scandal and spent all the time abusing the SEC.

God save the Republic.

Email Patrick Cleburne.

< Previous

Next >


This is a content archive of VDARE.com, which Letitia James forced off of the Internet using lawfare.