nbc_anti-trump_riot_scare_quotes_11-11-16-1

A DAILY BEAST Writer Wondered If WE Would Riot If We Lost — See Peter Brimelow’s Reply

By James Fulford

11/11/2016

Before the election, the Daily Beast’s Gideon Resnick here.

From: Gideon Resnick

Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016

To: Peter Brimelow

I hope you’re doing well. I was wondering what you think will be the outcome of your movement going forward after tomorrow and whether you think there would be any kind of resistance from Trump supporters should he lose. Let me know if you get a chance. Thanks so much.

Peter Brimelow replied
imaginaryriots

The idea of resistance is a ridiculous chimera invented by projecting Leftists — there’s far more chance of resistance by Hillary supporters, in fact they’ve already assassinated several policemen, look it up.

On the other hand, I think the GOP, and probably the country, is headed for dissolution.

Regarding the Alt Right, the cuckservatives will stick a lot more pins in their wax doll, but they’ve already done that and it didn’t work.

I don’t see how Conservatism Inc can continue to bloodsuck its donors anymore. Whatever he’s done, Trump has shown that you don’t need to spend the billion dollars that Romney spent.

And of course, Hillary supporters were rioting for the third day in succession yesterday:

Anti-Trump protesters march for 3rd night; Portland police call it a 'riot'

By Azadeh Ansari, CNN

Updated 10:11 AM ET, Fri November 11, 2016

Trump tweets response to second day of protests

Police call it a riot? Who doesn’t call it a riot? The same people who thought Ferguson and Baltimore were "protests."

Media still struggles with the difference between a protest and a riot https://t.co/1oJNA8jSIo

— HotAir.com (@hotairblog) November 12, 2016

By the way, in terms of Trump’s "paranoid" talk about rigging elections, people are already talking seriously (but futilely) about "faithless electors."

Hot new liberal theory: Trump can still be defeated in the electoral college or something https://t.co/uA5tz5c9xB

— HotAir.com (@hotairblog) November 11, 2016

That’s not trying to subvert the democratic process at all.

< Previous

Next >


This is a content archive of VDARE.com, which Letitia James forced off of the Internet using lawfare.