11/20/2017
Al Franken’s troubles are just beginning. Another accuser has stepped forward to accuse Franken of improperly touching her. And given how the Left says we must "listen and believe," it’s going to be hard for Franken to simply dismiss this.A woman says Sen. Al Franken inappropriately touched her in 2010, telling CNN that he grabbed her buttocks while taking a photo at the Minnesota State Fair …Lindsay Menz, a 33-year-old woman who now lives in Frisco, Texas, reached out to CNN on Thursday hours after Tweeden made her story public. Menz said she wanted to share an "uncomfortable" interaction that left her feeling "gross."
According to Menz, she attended the Minnesota State Fair with her husband and father in the summer of 2010, almost two years after Franken was elected to the Senate. Her father’s small business was sponsoring a local radio booth, and she spent the day meeting various elected officials, political candidates and celebrities and taking photos with them as they stopped by the booth.
When Franken walked in, Menz and her husband, who also spoke with CNN, said they recognized him right away. Menz said she had a brief and cordial exchange with the senator.
Then, as her husband held up her phone and got ready to snap a photo of the two of them, Franken "pulled me in really close, like awkward close, and as my husband took the picture, he put his hand full-fledged on my rear," Menz said. "It was wrapped tightly around my butt cheek."
[Woman says Franken inappropriately touched her in 2010, by MJ Lee, CNN, November 20, 2017]
Franken may lose his Senate seat. If so, the likely candidate to inherit it is Keith Ellison, the Deputy Chair of the Democrat Party and a past supporter of black nationalism. But it’s important to remember Al Franken only got the seat in the first place through electoral fraud.
In the '08 campaign, Republican Sen. Norm Coleman was running for re-election against Democrat Al Franken. It was impossibly close; on the morning after the election, after 2.9 million people had voted, Coleman led Franken by 725 votes.And as York points out, it was because Franken got in the Senate the Democrats were able to push through Obamacare.Franken and his Democratic allies dispatched an army of lawyers to challenge the results. After the first canvass, Coleman’s lead was down to 206 votes. That was followed by months of wrangling and litigation. In the end, Franken was declared the winner by 312 votes. He was sworn into office in July 2009, eight months after the election.
During the controversy a conservative group called Minnesota Majority began to look into claims of voter fraud. Comparing criminal records with voting rolls, the group identified 1,099 felons — all ineligible to vote — who had voted in the Franken-Coleman race.
Minnesota Majority took the information to prosecutors across the state, many of whom showed no interest in pursuing it. But Minnesota law requires authorities to investigate such leads. And so far, Fund and von Spakovsky report, 177 people have been convicted — not just accused, but convicted — of voting fraudulently in the Senate race. Another 66 are awaiting trial. "The numbers aren’t greater," the authors say, "because the standard for convicting someone of voter fraud in Minnesota is that they must have been both ineligible, and 'knowingly' voted unlawfully." The accused can get off by claiming not to have known they did anything wrong.
[York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots, by Byron York, Washington Examiner, August 6, 2012]
Needless to say, the GOP didn’t even squeak to stop this theft of a Senate seat. (Given how they seem to be eager to lose in Alabama, not much has changed.) But as Franken is now in disgrace, perhaps we can encourage some conservatives to recall some not so distant history. Of course, Franken should be kicked out of the Senate. He should have never been there in the first place. If this country had anything close to rational requirements for voting, he wouldn’t have been.
This is a content archive of VDARE.com, which Letitia James forced off of the Internet using lawfare.