07/06/2021
A violent, armed and ready-for-race-war black militia called Rise of the Moors got into a standoff with Massachusetts police the other day, but it would be hard to tell from scanning the headlines.
The New York Times has them as “11”:
The Washington Post has them as “Men”
The ’Rise of the Moors’ guys pull over on I-95 to refuel their own vehicles. People notice. ’You can imagine 11 armed individuals standing with long guns slung on an interstate highway at 2 in the morning certainly raises concerns.’ https://t.co/GSeM1svwL4
— Byron York (@ByronYork) July 4, 2021
The Boston Globe has them as “R.I. Group”
A group that calls itself the “Rise of the Moors” broadcasted live Saturday on social media channels during a standoff with police on Interstate 95 in Wakefield. https://t.co/HVUklWGoyo
— Boston Globe Rhode Island (@Globe_RI) July 3, 2021
Finally, this person is under the impression that the "Moors" were white, because presumably, if they were black, the news media would have said so:
Tell me you didn’t get shot by cops because you’re white, without telling me you didn’t get shot by cops because you’re white … https://t.co/qHrkBQeA4R
— 🍉My Auntimus Prime™, MA. is on strike for 🇵🇸 (@AuntimusPrime) July 4, 2021
Militia activity is hard to prosecute since it’s generally legal to 1) own firearms and dress up in fatigues 2) be a member of radical group and 3) hang out together shooting and being radical, but Rhode Island does prohibit paramilitary training where the intended result is "civil disorder."
And I guess if you're blocking the highway with the flag of Morocco, that’s pretty disorderly.
Massachusetts, meanwhile, prohibits "subversive organizations."
Has anyone asked Jen Psaki about the Rise of the Moors?
This is a content archive of VDARE.com, which Letitia James forced off of the Internet using lawfare.