By Steve Sailer
09/04/2021
From the Journal of the American Medical Association:
September 2, 2021
Jefferson M. Jones, et al
Question: Based on blood donations in the US from July 2020 through May 2021, how did infection- and vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence vary over time by demographic group and by geographic region?
Findings: In this repeated cross-sectional study that included 1 443 519 blood donation specimens from a catchment area representing 74% of the US population, estimated SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence weighted for differences between the study sample and general population increased from 3.5% in July 2020 to 20.2% for infection-induced antibodies
We don’t know how representative blood donors are at avoiding contracting covid. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were better than average, which would mean the national percentage for infections is higher than 20%.
Assuming blood donors are infected at the same rate as everybody else and children at the same rate as adults, that would be about 67 million American residents who have infection-induced antibodies. By the way, that would suggest an infection fatality rate of just under one percent.
and 83.3% for combined infection- and vaccine-induced antibodies in May 2021. …
That’s 83.3% of age 16 and up.
While some blood donors are winos, most donors are official Bad People: i.e., conscientious public-spirited citizens (i.e., middle-age white people).
Compared with the general population residing within the study regions, significantly more blood donors in the study were non-Hispanic White (85.0% vs 61.2%) and aged 50 to 64 years (36.5% vs 24.4%); significantly fewer donors were aged 16 to 29 years (12.1% vs 24.1%), Hispanic (6.2% vs 17.1%), non-Hispanic Asian (2.9% vs 6.2%), or non-Hispanic Black (2.5% vs 12.7%)
Among racial and ethnic groups, the infection-induced seroprevalence estimates in July 2020 for Hispanic (6.8%) and non-Hispanic Black (6.6%) persons were significantly higher than infection-induced estimates for other racial and ethnic groups (Figure 3). For the infection-induced seroprevalence in May 2021, the estimate for Hispanic persons (30.0%) was significantly higher than the estimates of all other racial and ethnic groups, the estimate for non-Hispanic Black persons (21.1%) was significantly higher than the estimates for all other racial and ethnic populations except Hispanic persons
Because blacks are at all times the helpless victims of Systemic Racism, almost nobody ever gives them credit when they do improve their behavior. Blacks got much better over the course of 2020 at avoiding getting infected with covid compared with Hispanics, but the media hasn’t noticed.
, and the estimate for non-Hispanic Asian persons (13.0%) was significantly lower than the estimates for other racial and ethnic groups, including non-Hispanic White persons (18.5%).
The combined seroprevalence estimates in May 2021 for non-Hispanic Asian persons (91.0%) was significantly higher than the estimates for all other racial and ethnic populations, and the estimate for non-Hispanic White persons (83.8%) was significantly higher than the estimates for non-Hispanic Black (79.2%) and Hispanic (81.5%) persons.
Note that in May 2021, the percentage of donors with antibodies from infections went down to 20.2% from a peak of 20.7% the previous month. This could be just statistical noise (although the sample size is quite high), but it could also be due to actual fading of antibodies from infections.
The row of numbers in the middle is official covid case counts reported by the CDC, while the row of numbers toward the bottom is the ratio of infection seroprevalence to official case counts. In July 2020, the CDC was counting 1/3.1 of all cases, but with more and better testing, by May 2021, that had fallen to 1/2.1.
After the FDA issued the first Emergency Use Authorization for a COVID-19 vaccine, COVID-19 vaccine administration began on December 14, 2020. By May 2021, the combined infection- and vaccination-induced seroprevalence estimate increased to 83.3%, and the infection-induced seroprevalence estimate increased to 20.2% …
For some reason, they aren’t telling us what percentage of vaccinated were also infected. I guess that vaccinations provide a subset of antibodies found in infected people but no unique antibodies, so they can’t count how many people, such as Donald Trump, got both an infection and a vaccination.
Limitations …
Fourth, vaccine-induced seroprevalence might be higher in blood donors than in the general population. For May 2021, among donations from donors with a known vaccine history, 73.3% were from donors who self-reported receiving a previous COVID-19 vaccine, compared with CDC estimates that 57.0% of US adults aged 18 years and older had received 1 dose or more of vaccine by May 2021. Blood donors are more likely than the general US population to be employed and have attended college, factors potentially associated with increased rates of vaccination and lower rates of infection. …
In estimating 83% combined (infection-induced and vaccine-induced) seroprevalence, try to adjust for the whiter and more middle-aged demographics of blood donors to match up with the demographics of the whole country. If 73% of blood donors were vaccinated by 5/31/21 vs. 57% of all adults, that might suggest that combined seroprevalence for the whole country was 16 points lower than the 83% found among donors, or, say, 67% of adults.
Of course, herd immunity
Ninth, children aged younger than 16 years cannot donate blood and were not included in this study.
Tenth, the findings in this analysis predate the surge in SARS-CoV-2 infection in the US related to transmission of the Delta variant.
A few months ago, 67% with antibodies from infection or vaccination would have sounded pretty close to herd immunity, especially since both methods seemed to be over 90% efficacious.
But then along came the more infectious Delta variant, raising the herd immunity threshold, and reducing the efficacy of at least the vaccines and perhaps also infection. And the antibodies, especially from vaccines, seem to fade pretty quickly.
So, it could be that we’ll never get to herd immunity.
On the other hand, this latest Delta wave, while nasty, seems to be fading where it first struck. For example, here’s the state of Missouri, which was where Delta seemed to get roaring first in the late spring:
[Comment at Unz.com]
This is a content archive of VDARE.com, which Letitia James forced off of the Internet using lawfare.