By Steve Sailer
09/28/2013
From an editorial in the L.A. Times:
EDITORIALL.A. Unified’s iPad plan doesn’t compute
The district’s failure to resolve questions about theft, breakage and Web security is troubling.
By The Times editorial board
September 27, 2013
It has been a year since Los Angeles Unified schools Supt. John Deasy proposed putting a tablet computer in the hands of every student in the district. At that time, there were numerous questions about how and whether this would work. Could first-graders really take care of such expensive equipment? Who would be held responsible if one of the devices was stolen, lost or broken, or if apple juice was dripped into the circuitry? How would the district keep high-schoolers off porn sites? And how much would all this cost?
Deasy said these details would be worked out before any decisions were made. But all we know for sure a year later is the price tag: a whopping $1 billion to provide more than 600,000 students and their teachers with top-of-the-line, software-equipped iPads at $678 each, plus the necessary Wi-Fi in the schools.
The district has forged ahead — 47,000 students have received iPads already, with a much bigger purchase planned soon — yet vital issues remain inadequately addressed.
Still unclear, for example, is who pays for accidental loss or damage to the iPads. Under the district’s contract, Apple will replace up to 5% of the devices for free. After that, the district is on its own. Parents at different schools have been given different information about whether they would have to cover the cost, and Deasy said he’s still trying to figure this out. Isn’t this something he should have done before any iPads were purchased?
The district also is coming to terms with how quickly its students disabled the firewall on their tablets to gain broad access to the Internet when they're not on campus. There are potential liability and safety issues at stake — if, for example, a student were to make contact with a sexual predator on a school-issued iPad.
While it tries to figure that out, the district has decreed that students may not take the tablets home, which seriously limits their usefulness as tools for integrating their class studies and homework. …
There’s also the matter of keyboards. Apparently the district hadn’t foreseen that it might need to purchase them as well, at a so-far unknown cost.
Access to iPads and other high-tech devices could be of tremendous benefit to L.A. Unified students, many of whom have few digital resources at home.But at this point, the district should be well beyond the "we're figuring this out" phase. It has spent some $30 million already, and in November, Deasy is scheduled to ask for close to $200 million more to provide iPads for an additional 300,000 students by the end of the school year. Given the many easily foreseen questions that have not been resolved, the board should require a more gradual rollout so that problems can be identified and addressed before it is too late to change course.
It’s worthwhile to compare the evident quality of management at LAUSD vs the quality of management at Apple, which made $6.9 billion in profit last quarter. Who do you think got taken advantage of in this negotiation? One problem with education leadership these days is that the cynical bastards who can anticipate problems tend to get screened out by the ideological emphasis on Closing the Gap. You wind up with inspirational True Believers who fall in love with whatever the latest fad is.
Personally, if I were buying a billion dollars worth of stuff from one of the best run companies in the world, I would present them with a list of a dozen things that could go wrong and ask them how they were going to keep me from looking like a fool. And then I'd ask Apple for two dozen more things that could go wrong that I didn’t put on my list and how they were going to prevent them.
This is a content archive of VDARE.com, which Letitia James forced off of the Internet using lawfare.