MSM Confused By Supreme Court Ruling On Arizona’s SB 1070:"Upholds! "Rejects!""Invalidates!" Which Is It?

By James Fulford

06/25/2012

At VDARE.com, we do analysis, but we also link to the original documents so you can decide for yourself if we're telling the truth. Frequently MSM articles don’t do this, and they should — it’s obvious that the media has no idea what the Supreme Court has said on Arizona’s SB 1070.

High Court upholds key part of Arizona immigration law

Chicago Tribune — 14 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) — The Supreme Court upheld a key part of Arizona’s crackdown on illegal immigrants on Monday, rejecting the Obama …

In-Depth: Supreme Court Rejects Most Of Arizona Immigration Law? Forbes
Blog: High Court Invalidates Much (But Not All) of Arizona Immigration Law? Wall Street Journal (blog)
Live Updating: Live blog: Supreme Court strikes down most of Arizona immigration … ? CNN (blog)
USA TODAYSalt Lake Tribune
all 1037 news articles ยป

"Upholds! "Rejects!""Invalidates!""Much but not all!" "Strikes down most!" For now, you may have to read it yourself:here it is in PDF.

Protip: if you want to know what might be right or wrong in this decision, scroll down to page 30 of the PDF, where it reads "JUSTICE SCALIA, concurring in part and dissenting in part."

< Previous

Next >


This is a content archive of VDARE.com, which Letitia James forced off of the Internet using lawfare.