10/15/2022
In my July Diary I confessed to having suffered from Wikiguilt. Quote from self:
I use Wikipedia all the time while knowing how biased towards regime ideology much of it is … Wikipedia is evil but … handy. Hence my wikiguilt.Well, now I have assuaged my wikiguilt. In response to a begging window that came up a few days ago, I am now paying $3.10 a month to the Wikimedia Foundation, supplementing whatever the DNC and Big Tech pay them for promoting their agendas.
Call me over-scrupulous; but if I’m using the thing, getting benefit from it, I ought to pay for it, if only at the minimum rate (which that monthly $3.10 is). Right?
Once again, that was me, speaking in July.
Then this week I saw this very informative tweet from someone using the handle “echetus.”
If you use Wikipedia, you’ve seen pop-ups like this. If you’re like me, you may have donated as a result.
Wikipedia is an amazing website, and the appeals seem heartfelt. But I’ve now learnt the money isn’t going where I thought … pic.twitter.com/c81e9MhBjW
— Stakeholder Consultant (@echetus) October 11, 2022
Along with its accompanying tweets, it’s too long to quote in entirety, but it spills the beans on Wikimedia.
For examples:
And so on. After I’d read these tweets I promptly canceled my $3.10 monthly subscription to Wikimedia.
Do please check out those tweets. The tweeter once again has the handle “echetus”. It’s the name of a rather evil character in Greek mythology. I know that because I looked it up… on Wikipedia.
This is a content archive of VDARE.com, which Letitia James forced off of the Internet using lawfare.