NYT Calls Bastille Day Muslim Kamikaze Truck Driver A "Frenchman Of Tunisian Origin"

By James Fulford

07/14/2016

In Scores Reported Dead in Nice, France, as Truck Plows Into Bastille Day Crowd, By Alissa J. Rubin, Adam Nossiter And Christopher Mele, NYT, July 14, 2016, the New York Times, which earlier wondered about a possible motive for this 9/11 scale crime, writes:
There was no immediate claim of responsibility, and the identity of the driver was not immediately clear, but the Nice Matin newspaper reported early Friday that he was a 31-year-old Frenchman of Tunisian origin. [Archive.is. link]
Does that mean a first generation immigrant, born in Tunisia, or a Tunisian with French citizenship because he was born in a Tunisian neighborhood in France? I don’t know, but whatever it means, it doesn’t mean a "Frenchman" in the way that term is understood by (a) the French, and (b) native speakers of English.

France is much more of an ethnostate than the US, Canada, or Australia. It makes sense to speak of someone of Arab descent born in Detroit as an American — it doesn’t make sense to refer to someone of the same ethnicity born in a suburb of Paris as a "Frenchman." We've been explaining it here for fifteen years — see Racial Gangrape: Another Diversity Disaster, by the late Sam Francis, August 9, 2001

Back in April, 11 young black males went on trial in Paris for the gang rape of a 14-year-old white girl seven years ago. Rapes happen all the time, of course, but this one was unusually notable. It turned out to be a ritual for initiation into a gang. (VDARE.com note: The Guardian story on this case refers to the rapists as “French youths”. See Peter Brimelow’s review of Paved with Good Intentions for a discussion of this media phenomenon.)

< Previous

Next >


This is a content archive of VDARE.com, which Letitia James forced off of the Internet using lawfare.